



Marina Abramovic’s self portraits are very dramatic with clear focal points and luxurious simplicity. While the simplicity and cleanliness of Cui Xiuwen’s work is all encompassing, Abramovic manages a clean image using lush textures in “warm” contexts. Her work is generally more relatable to the modern woman than Kahlo’s cultural focus and Xiuwen’s overt modernism. Her portraits tell the story of a middle-age women as the heroine of her own life. She obviously carries strong opinions and self-worth, having produced work that touches on politics, morality, and feminine identity. I find her work particularly significant given the modern emphasis on youth when it comes to emotional drama and self-discovery. I believe her work is an intimate look inside a woman who has seen a great deal but recognizes how much she has yet to learn.
Frida Kahlo paints to show pride in her cultural identity. Her look says it all: security, pride, confidence, as well as ethnic identity, acceptance and awareness. Where our modern culture pokes fun at unibrows as unsightly imperfections to be waxed or razed off our faces, Kahlo wears hers proudly as an emblem of her origins and earthly connection. Her style in both photography and painting mirrors this earthy quality and delivers and unexpected relatablility. As some of her works are abstract and quirky, her humanity is immediately evident. Whether or not it is intended, the message sent from the range of moods displayed in her work is that the fear of foreigners often blinds people to the fact that people, particularly women, are essentially the same everywhere you go.
Cui Xiuwen’s work is extremely clean and limited in color and style. She has an extremely unique style, but it is also very narrow. Though many of her works depict herself in early stages of pregnancy, the approach to the images is very detached and cold, providing great contrast to the subject matter. Another trend of her self portrait is the purposely poor photo-editing, where most of the surrealist images do not look like they occupy the same space. If it were not for the coordinating colors and forward-thinking makeup artistry, some works would look better suited in an entry-level Photoshop class. I can, however, appreciate the contemporary simplicity these works provide. Though they are sterile, they still manage to communicate femininity.
My first reaction to Gregory Crewdson was confusion. I think I focused more on trying to make sense of the picture than the actual composition. As I read further, I discovered that inner questions are his intent. The only sense I could make of it was that all the pieces had something to do with small-town domestic life. His art reveals something about the true mindset of people we pass by every day.
Teun Hocks work is my personal favorite due to his simplicity and quirky humor. Unlike Crewdson, Hocks work is a quick laugh and the message is extremely accessible while also being beautiful. Hocks main series uses the same model so that the focus is on the action, not the person. He has an isolated and obvious focal point and does not use excessive wide shots like Crewdson. Instead of having to decipher his work, Hocks treats the viewer to his off-beat imagination.
Jeff wall is in great contrast with the first two artists wherein he uses more muted colors and has more serious subject matter. Though Crewdson did suggest a deeper meaning to the awkwardness of his work, Crewdson makes his somber tone apparent from the start. I viewed his main focuses as urban social interaction and the relationship of humanity to death. I wasn’t all together impressed with his composition but he is very raw as an artist and that is something to be admired.
Cindy Sherman’s style is extremely glamorous and is completely devoid of color, whereas the other artists relied on it. Sherman focuses more on value and its interactions with light in creating a “feel” for the subject. What struck me first was the eerie type of glamour in which she photographs and what it may suggest about her subjects. Of course, the period clothing suggests that the classic woman is timeless, but perhaps it goes deeper. I though she may be making a statement about how the media makes us forget the woman as perpetually human and seeks to make her an icon. Either way, she takes a route that is a step above mimicry and in doing so, she highlights the difference between what we are used to seeing and what she has laid before us.